Posts

False Negative

 A false negative in software testing occurs when a test fails to detect a defect or issue in the software, meaning the test result shows that everything is fine when there actually is a problem. This means a real issue goes unnoticed. Example: Imagine you have a test that checks if a login feature works correctly. The test is supposed to verify that users cannot log in with invalid credentials. If the test passes and reports that the login feature is secure, but in reality, users can log in with invalid credentials, this is a false negative. Causes: Insufficient Test Coverage: The test might not cover all possible scenarios or edge cases, allowing some defects to slip through. Test Script Errors: The test script might have flaws or omissions that prevent it from detecting certain issues. Data Issues: Using incorrect or incomplete test data might lead to missed defects. Configuration Problems: Incorrect configurations in the test environment can cause some issues to remain unde...

False Positive

 A false positive in software testing is when a test incorrectly indicates the presence of a defect or issue in the software when there actually is none. This means the test result shows a problem that doesn't exist, leading to unnecessary investigation and troubleshooting. Example: Imagine you have a test that checks if a login feature works correctly. The test is supposed to verify that users can log in with valid credentials. If the test fails and reports that the login feature is broken, but in reality, the login feature works perfectly fine, this is a false positive. Causes: Test Script Errors: The test script itself might have an error, causing it to fail even when the application works correctly. Environment Issues: Issues in the test environment, such as incorrect configurations or network problems, might lead to false positives. Timing Issues: Tests might run too quickly before the system has fully updated or responded, leading to incorrect failure reports. Impact: Wast...

Test Metrics

  Test Coverage Metrics: Test Case Coverage: This metric measures the percentage of the application's functionality covered by your test suite. A higher percentage indicates more comprehensive testing. Code Coverage: This metric signifies the percentage of code executed by your automated tests. It helps identify areas of the code that might not be receiving enough testing. Branch Coverage: This metric delves deeper, measuring the percentage of conditional branches (if/else statements) in your code exercised by tests. It helps ensure different code paths are being tested. Test Execution Metrics: Number of Test Cases Executed: This is the simple count of test cases run during a test execution cycle. Test Execution Pass Rate: This metric calculates the percentage of test cases that passed successfully. A high pass rate signifies good test quality and potentially fewer defects. Test Execution Fail Rate: This metric is the opposite of the pass rate, indicating the percentage of t...

100% Percent Test Coverage

  Testing Methodologies: Shift Left Testing: Focus on testing early in the development lifecycle, identifying and fixing bugs during development rather than later stages. This includes unit testing, code reviews, and static analysis tools. Agile Testing: Integrate testing closely with development in an iterative approach. As features are developed, tests are written and executed concurrently. Exploratory Testing: Encourage testers to explore the application freely, looking for unexpected behavior and usability issues. Model-Based Testing: Create models that represent the expected behavior of the system and use them to automate test case generation. Testing Techniques: Equivalence Partitioning: Divide the input space into valid and invalid partitions based on expected behavior. Create test cases for each partition. Boundary Value Analysis: Test cases around the edges or boundaries of valid input ranges (e.g., minimum, maximum values). Error Guessing: Based on your knowle...

MDR Process

 MDR (Minimum Detectable Rate) process in testing typically refers to a statistical concept used in quality assurance and testing, especially in the context of manufacturing, healthcare, or clinical trials. It determines the smallest rate of occurrence that can be reliably detected by a test or inspection process. Here’s an overview of the MDR process in testing: Overview of the MDR Process Defining the Scope: Identify the test or inspection process where MDR is to be applied. Determine the specific defect or condition that needs to be detected. Statistical Analysis: Use statistical methods to determine the smallest rate of occurrence that can be detected given the sample size and confidence level. Calculate the MDR based on the acceptable level of risk (alpha level, typically 5%) and the desired power of the test (1 - beta level, typically 80%). Setting the Detection Threshold: Establish the detection threshold based on the MDR calculation. Ensure that the test process is sensitiv...

Fail Fast

  "Fail fast" is a concept and practice commonly used in software development, testing, and other engineering disciplines. It refers to the idea of designing systems and processes to detect and handle errors as early as possible. The goal is to minimize the time and effort spent on flawed paths and to ensure that issues are identified and addressed quickly, which can save resources and prevent cascading failures. Key Points of the "Fail Fast" Principle Early Detection of Errors : Systems or processes should be designed to immediately identify when something goes wrong. This allows for quick correction and prevents the continuation of a flawed process. Immediate Feedback : By failing fast, developers and engineers get immediate feedback on what went wrong, enabling them to fix issues promptly and effectively. Improved Quality : Catching errors early can lead to higher overall quality, as problems are addressed before they propagate and cause more significant issues....

JavaFx

JavaFX Scenic View is a debugging tool specifically designed for JavaFX applications. It allows developers to inspect the visual hierarchy, properties, and styles of JavaFX nodes in real-time while the application is running. This can be incredibly helpful for debugging layout and styling issues, as well as understanding the structure of complex UIs. Live Inspection : Developers can hover over UI elements in their JavaFX application to see information about the node, including its type, ID, CSS styles, and properties. Node Tree : Scenic View provides a visual representation of the node hierarchy, allowing developers to understand the parent-child relationships between nodes. CSS Inspection : Developers can view and modify CSS styles applied to individual nodes, helping to diagnose styling issues and experiment with different styles. Layout Debugging : Scenic View includes tools for debugging layout issues, such as visualizing layout bounds, insets, and alignment constraints. Event Moni...